In Connections: Virtual Learning Communities, Richard Schwier explains the important of building communities in which learning can take place. Whether in a virtual setting or tradition brick-and-mortar classroom, people learn best when they are able to explore new ideas collaboratively in a supportive community. Schwier outlines some of the advantages and disadvantages of a virtual learning community.
On the one hand, virtual interactions fell less authentic because they are lacking some of the non-verbal queues we all use in face-to-face communication. While videoconferencing helps to make online conversations more real, there is no substitute for the physical immediacy and feelings associated with place that contribute so much to our interactions when we are present together.
This apparent disadvantage to virtual communication can also be an advantage. The technology that serves as a barrier to authentic communication can also help people feel protected. Schwier offers the example of a student more willing to question the positions of other students or even the professor when shielded by technology. Also, virtual communication affords students with a vastly greater potential to forge connections with people all over the world. This is the inherent advantage of a virtual learning community.
To that end, I anticipate more educators embracing social networking technology as a tool to help students network with people outside of their traditional communities. For children, there are privacy and security issues that will always require limiting their interactions with outsiders. For adult learners, it is easy to begin making connections with other people safely. Facebook is by far the most popular social network today. According to Facebook, there are 750 million users. That is over 10% of the world’s overall population and over 35% of internet users worldwide. With that many users, Facebook has an extraordinary potential to be the go-to place for people interested in extended their own personal learning networks, but in its current design, there are some limitations.
The biggest limitation that I see, is the way Facebook treats your “friends”. In the eyes of Facebook, all of your “friends” are the same. That is, you want to share everything with all of them. Facebook does let you share post with just individual people that you specify, but this feature is cumbersome at best. You have to select each individual person each time or have one group that you use repeatedly. While this may works to maintain an existing network it makes it hard to build a personal learning network. For my own part, I am reluctant to “friend” someone I meet through Facebook who might have similar professional and academic interests because I do not want to share my personal life with them as I would with the rest of my “friends”.
This is where I see Google Plus becoming the network of choice for people who wish to make connections with others on a more professional basis. At the same time, it will also serve people well who wish to stay in touch with their actual friends and family. Because Google Plus enables users to create “circles” of contacts, users can easily share content with the right audience. For instance, I have an Education Circle and a Technology Circle. When I share cute pictures of my dogs, I only share them with my Friends and Family circles. In this environment it is much easier to find people who share your interests and to network with them. I am much more willing to add people to my network when I know that I can easily share just the content I want to share with them.
I imagine other social networks, including Facebook, will adopt this approach. I hope educators recognize the potential of this new networking technology to build broader virtual learning communities. Some already do. You can meet them on Googe Plus.